Yes No Share to Facebook
Statutory Supremacy Rights and Duties Within the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Is a Lease Containing Terms That Alter Statutorily Prescribed Rights or Duties Legal?
A Landlord and Tenant Are Unable to Alter the Rights and Duties Prescribed Within the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 and Any Terms Within A Lease or Other Form of Agreement That Attempt to Alter Such Rights and Duties Are Avoid and Unenforceable.
Understanding the Supremacy of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 As Applicable Regardless of Agreed Lease Terms
Despite that a landlord or tenant may be willing to waive certain rights or duties that are statutorily prescribed, with only a very rare exceptions, such rights and duties are unalterable and any terms within a lease or other agreement purporting to waive such rights or duties are void and unenforceable.
The Law
The Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, Chapter 17, forbids lease terms or any other form of agreement from altering the rights and duties prescribed within the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. Specifically, the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, states:
Provisions conflicting with Act void
4 (1) Subject to subsection 12.1 (11) and section 194, a provision in a tenancy agreement that is inconsistent with this Act or the regulations is void.
There are many cases to confirm that attempts to contractually alter the prescribed provisions within the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, or regulations thereto, are void and unenforceable. Such cases, among others, include White et al. v. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, 2020 ONSC 7822, wherein each it was said:
Summary Comment
Terms within a lease, or another form of agreement, that purport to alter or forgo the statutory rights and duties as prescribed within the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, and regulations thereto, are void with only a few very rare exceptions.
